THE HADITH'S WHICH DOESN'T REACH THE PROPHET صلى الله عليه وسلم , A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE NARRATIONS OF ABU HURAYRAH FROM K'AB AL AHBAR (رضي الله عنه)
The term isra’iliyyat (sing. isra’iliyyah) has been used by
various Muslim scholars to denote foreign material, more specifically of Jewish
and Christian origin, that has found its way into several genres of Islamic
literature, including Qur’anic exegesis. Some of this material was transmitted
in the form of stories dealing with the origins of the universe or past
prophets and their nations from as early as the first generation of Muslims
after the veiling of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم.
Abu Ishaq Ka‘b ibn Mati‘ al-Himyari Al Ahbar came from a Jewish
tribe in Himyar, Yemen. Although he lived during the time of the Prophet
Muhammad, he never actually met him. He came to Madinah from Yemen and became a
Muslim during the caliphate of ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab, although some sources
state that it was before then, during Abu Bakr’s rule (رضي الله عنه).
Many of the entries on Ka‘b al-Ahbar within the biographical
dictionaries clearly indicate that both Abu Hurayrah (رضي الله عنه) and Ibn ‘Abbas رضي الله عنه narrated from Ka‘b al-Ahbar[1]
It is well-known and accepted that Abu Hurayrah and Ka‘b conversed
with one another on several occasions, demonstrating the the amicable
relationship that existed between the two[2] What is at issue here is not the reliability (or lack thereof) of
Ka‘b in his transmission of narrations to the Companions, but rather the
verifiability of the narrations’ contents and/or attribution as well as their
ultimate origin. A further point of interest to note is how some of these
various traditions are treated by Ibn Kathir and other hadith scholars in
regards to their ambivalence about the isra’iliyyat. The aforementioned points
will become even more pronounced when dealing with the exegetical traditions of
Ibn ‘Abbas and his relationship with Ka‘b and the isra’iliyya
To begin with, in analyzing those traditions that involve Abu
Hurayrah, Ka‘b and the isra’iliyyat, it will be useful to examine some of Ibn
Kathir’s comments on certain Prophetic traditions narrated by Abu Hurayrah that
Ibn Kathir suspects are either of the isra’iliyyat or are the words of Ka‘b. In
such cases, Ibn Kathir makes conjectures about the possible origin of the
tradition, but he nonetheless clearly objects to having such words attributed
to the Prophet himself and feels that an error occurred during the transmission
of the particular tradition.
For example, in the commentary on Q2:255 and Q35:40, Ibn Kathir
relates a tradition from various sources narrated by Abu Hurayrah that he heard
the Prophet once state while speaking about a question that once occurred to
Moses: Does God sleep? The
tradition goes on to state how God, in response to Moses’ question, sent an
angel with two glass vessels and the command to Moses to carry these two
vessels, one in each hand, and to preserve them without letting them drop.
Every time Moses would nearly fall asleep, the vessels would almost slip from
his hands and he would awaken, until eventually, he fell asleep and they fell from his
grasp breaking on the ground. What God did was to cast an analogy for Moses—had
God ever fallen asleep, likewise the heavens and the earth would not be upheld
and would come crashing down. After narrating the tradition, Ibn
Kathir states how “this tradition is extremely strange, and is most likely an
isra’ili that is not traceable (to the Prophet)”[3] and adds in another place that
it is “from the objectionable isra’iliyyat.[4]” Ibn Kathir also mentions how it
is very unlikely Moses could ever have asked such a question knowing the
true nature of God[5]. Interestingly,
unlike for other traditions, Ibn Kathir does not consider the possibility that
Abu Hurayrah may have procured this narration from Ka‘b. Instead, he goes on to
refer to another tradition of Ibn ‘Abbas who related that the Children of
Israel once asked Moses, “Does God sleep?” to which he replied, “Fear God
(ittaqu ’l-lah)!” after which God beckoned Moses, gave him two glass vessels to
hold and preserve, and the rest of the story goes as narrated above[6]
[1]See
Nawawi, Tahdhib Al-Asma’, Vol 1, p 2, 68; Ibn Hajar Al-‘Asqalani, Tahdhib
Al-tahdhib, vol 8, Pg 438; Ibn ‘Asakir, Tarikh madinat Dimashq, vol 50, Pg 151;
Al-Dhahabi, Siyar a‘lam Al-Nubala’, vol 3, Pg 490.
[2] It is
related (although with a weak chain of transmission according to Shu‘ayb
al-Arna’ut}) that Abu Hurayrah once met Ka‘b, and after conversing with him and
asking him questions, Ka‘b remarked, “I have not seen anyone more knowledgeable
of the Torah without having read it than Abu Hurayrah.” See Ibn ‘Asakir, Tarikh
madinat Dimashq, vol 67, Pg 343; Al-Dhahabi, Siyar a‘lam Al-Nubala’, vol 2, Pg
600, esp. n. 1; idem, Kitab Tadhkirat Al-Huffaz, 4 vols. (Hyderabad-Deccan:
Osmania Oriental Publications Bureau, 1955), v. 1, 36.
[3] Ibn
Kathir, Tafsir, vol 1, Pg 679. The Arabic reads: wa hadha hadith gharib jiddan
wa ‘l-azhar annahu isra’ili la marfu‘. This same tradition is narrated in al-Tabari’s
tafsir as well although he adds no commentary to it; however, in the edition of
Shakir and Shakir, there is a note mentioning what various scholars have said
about the narrators found in the isnad of this hadith, some of whom were found
to narrate objectionable (munkar) traditions, quoting the example of this
tradition in particular. Ibn Hajar’s view of this tradition is that it is
objectionable (hence, not attributable to the Prophet) and that Moses could not
have asked such a question, but rather, what exists is a narration where the
Children of Israel asked Moses this question instead. See al-Tabari, Jami‘
al-bayan, vol 5, Pg 394, esp. n. 1.
[4] Ibn
Kathir, Tafsir, vol 6, Pg 558. Similarly, the Arabic here reads: inna hadha ’l-hadith
laysa bi-marfu‘ bal min al-isra’iliyyat al-munkarah.
[5] Ibid.
No comments:
Post a Comment